Occupation without army
Dec 16th
Sunday, Dhu al-Hijjah 6, 1428
The prophetic saying goes like – A munafiq (someone camouflaged in friend’s clothing) is more dangerous than an open enemy – especially when such ‘friend’ tells you who you should trust; how you should run your affairs; who should be your political or religious leaders – and exploits your weaknesses to break all principles to include the corrupt in it, then ‘the friend’ becomes a virtual occupier – without firing a shot.
Unfortunately, most of the 57 Muslim nation-states are occupied by such ‘friends’ – such as the US, Britain, France, Russia and Saudi Arabia. One of the longest targets of such ‘friends’ has been – no other than the only Muslim nuclear State – Pakistan. Since the assassination of its first prime minister, Liaqat Ali Khan (allegedly by CIA/Mossad) – Washington has played the ‘king maker’ – directly or through its Saudi proxy – by interfering in country’s government and military affairs. Pakistan’s military dictatorships (4); all its prime ministers (two of them, Moin Qureshi and Shaukat Aziz, both US citizen – lived out of Pakistan for decades) and military top officials – were ‘approved’ by the US States Department. Lt. Gen. Gul Hamid (ISI chief) was not allowed to become C-in-C, because Washington considered him to be a ‘Jihadi’. After, Gen. Pervez Musharraf brought military coup against civilian government of Nawaz Sharif – he was told by the US to retire three of the six army core commanders – for being having sympathies for Taliban and Muslim Resistance groups in Indian occupied Kashmir. The day, this order was implemented – US forces attacked Afghanistan next day in October 2001.
Riyadh convinced deposed Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif to take exile into Saudi Arabia instead putting resistance to Musharraf’s military dictatorship. Now it’s playing a similar game with Pakistan’s former Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry – to get him to agree to go into exile in Saudi Arabia. Iddi Amin, who lived and died in Saudi Arabia, was another victim.
Western ‘double standards’ are obvious – It’s not considered ‘interference in internal affairs’ when leaders of the US and western countries keep ‘demanding’ that Muslim governments do this or that to become ‘modernized’ or ‘civilized’. One wonder, how would the US and its media react if some leader of a Muslim country demanded the end of the Patriot Act and the closing down of Guantanamo Bay and other US concentration camps?
Another latest US puppetry is the return of pro-USrael corrupt Benazir Bhutto (2-times former prime minister). When Washington realized that she couldn’t win majority in Parliament to form an independent pro-USrael government – Riyadh convinced Musharraf to allow Nawaz Sharif to return – hoping that his party ML (N) would take some steam out of its rival ML (Q) – making it possible for Bhutto’s PPP party to cash on this split.
Both Bhutto and her backers in USrael have started the campaign that the coming elections are already ‘pre-rigged’. Looking at the facts on ground – of course they are –
when Washington forces Musharraf to withdraw all cases corruption and murder in Pakistan and abroad, against Benazir. They are pre-rigged when Nawaz Sharif and his brother are disqualified from contesting elections but not her.
Both Washington and Riyadh played a significant part in the dismemberment of Pakistan – separation of its East wing into Bangladesh.
Dialogue between scholar and Khalifah
Dec 15th
Saturday, Dhu al-Hijjah 5, 1428
The Umayyid Khalifah, Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik (54-99H), who killed young Muhammad bin Qasim, the first Muslim commander to bring Muslim rule to India (712 CE) – but nominated Hazrat Umar bin Abdul Aziz (ra) as the next Khalifah – once while in Medinnah, had the following conversation with Abu Hazim:
Khalifah – Who is the most honorable among the servants of Allah?
Abu Hazim – Those who are mindful of their fellow-human beings, and possess the right kind of understanding to know the truth.
Khalifah – Which is the best among good deeds?
Abu Hazim – Fulfilling the obligations laid down by Allah, and keeping away from what He has forbidden.
Khalifah – Which dua is likely to be accepted by Allah?
Abu Hazim – The dua of a man for you for whom you have done some good.
Khalifah – What is the best form of charity?
Abu Hazim – Giving as much as one can, in spite of one’s own need, to a man in misery without trying to make him feel grateful and without torturing him with reminders of your favors.
Khalifah – Which is the best form of speech?
Abu Hazim – Speaking the truth plainly and unreservedly before the man who can harm you in some way or from whom you expect a favor.
Khalifah – What kind of person is wisest?
Abu Hazim – The one whose actions are governed by obedience to Allah, and who invites others as well to it.
Khalifah – What kind of person is the most foolish?
Abu Hazim – One who helps another person in committing some injustice.
Khalifah – Would you make prayer for me?
Abu Hazim – ‘O Allah, if You approve of Sulayman, make the well-being of this world and the next easily accessible to him; but if he is Your enemy, drag him by his hair towards the deeds You approve of. (Reported in Musnad of Darimi)
Historic delusion of Judeo-Christians
Dec 15th
Saturday, Dhu al-Hijjah 5, 1428
Historically, there is no competition between Muslim and western civilizations to see who are the greater victims -whether it’s the Jews and the Christians who suffered in the hands of the Muslims or the opposite was the case.
Historically, Jewish tribes in Arabia, no only collaborated with the pagans to destroy the small Muslim community, they also attempted to kill the Prophet (pbuh) several times. Once they invited him to come to a neutral place with three companions where both parties could engage in a religious debate. In good faith, the Prophet (pbuh) agreed. Before he started, however, a Jewish lady informed her brother who was a Muslim that the Jews were coming with weapons and their intention was to murder the Prophet (pbuh). Knowing this Prophet (pbuh) cancelled the trip. At another occasion, the Prophet (pbuh) went to the Jewish quarters to mitigate a dispute between two contending parties. Finding him insecure, they attempted to roll a rock over his head from the roof of the house in which he was sitting. Miraculously, he escaped. Once, his food was poisoned and it is said that the poisoned lamb from which he had eaten contributed to his deteriorating health when he passed away a few years later.
Historically, the attitude of the Judeo-Christian world against Islam and its prophet has been extremely negative. The Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) has been labeled “anti-Christ”, “imposter”, and so on and the Muslims as “Mohammedan”, “heathens” and “infidels”. Western Orientalists (mostly Jewish) of the last few centuries had mostly produced biased materials against Islam and Muslims. They did not even spare the Prophet (pbuh) from personal attacks on his character – in contrast to the respect that Muslims accord to biblical prophets, such as, Abraham, Moses, David, Solomon, John the Baptist, Jesus, etc. Some of them went as far as suggesting that he suffered from epilepsy and his revelations were caused by epileptic fits!
Historically, to Judeo-Christians, the word “Crusade” is synonymous to bravery and courage. To a Muslim, that word brings to mind acts of pillage and massacre of 90,000 Muslims, Jews and Christians in Jerusalem in 1099 CE. In 1492 CE, the Spanish Inquisition resulted in the Holocaust of 3-5 million Muslims and 147,000 Jews. The survivors were forced to change religion or burnt to death. No one was spared, not even the children. Changing religion was not enough – they were forced to transform into being Spanish.
Historically, during the two centuries of western colonization of Muslim world – The wealth and resources of the Muslims lands were transferred to Europe – with the result that the Muslim lands remained underdeveloped. After the demise of last Muslim empire (Ottoman) in 1918 CE – Its Arab dominion was cut into pieces by the French and British colonialists to pave the way for the establishment of European proxy State of Zionist Israel in 1948 CE. In the 1990s came the genocide of Muslims in Bosnia and Chechnya. Currently, we are witnessing the slaughter of innocent Muslims by the Judeo-Christian forces in Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Somalia, Philippines, Chechnya, and several other parts of the world.
Can Zionist be loyal to anyone?
Dec 14th
Friday, Dhu al-Hijjah 4, 2007
The Zionist Lord Arthur James Balfour (1848-1930) was British Foreign Secretary, when he authored the notorious Balfour Declaration in 1917, supporting the establishment of a ‘Jewish homeland’ in Muslim-majority Palestine. Earlier, Balfour was also British Prime Minister from 1902 to 1905.
But western history is ripe with the disloyalty of Jews, especially the Zionist ones. For example, the former USSR was mostly ruled by Jewish Communist elites; the largest Jewish settlers came from USSR including Israel’s first president, Dr. Chaim Weisman – The Zionist-regime never forgave Moscow for having ‘good relations’ with Egypt, Syria, Iraq and PLO. The Americans have been treated worse than Russia – even after proving over US$3 trillion worth military and financial aid in addition to veto-protection in United Nations. All sections of American politic, media and finance is controlled by Jewish Lobby, protecting Zionist occupation of Palestine.
Now – The Amos Trust, a British Christian charity that works with needy communities around the world, is marketing the traditional Nativity sets made by Palestinian carpenters from olive wood from Bethlehem – which Jewish groups have labeled “Anti-Semitic”. However, Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Organization of America, has claimed: “The British have a very long history of anti-Semitism – with the fact that the most popular name for a newborn in England is now Mohammed, tells what is happening to England and Europe!”
The Zionist-regime and its lobby (ADL) are most upset about the Nativity set. Their responses are rather amusing and pathetic at the same time.
http://www.crosswalk.com/news/11561576/
It’s useless to mention their hatred towards Islam and Muslims – considering the fact that, historically, Muslims liberated Jews from Christians’ slavery in Jerusalem (638), Spain (711), Palestine (1186), and gave them refuge in 1940s by Turkey (over 100,000 European Jews), and French Muslims.
“Save Darfur” or Destroy Sudan
Dec 14th
Friday, Dhu al-Hijjah 4, 1428
Muslim-majority Sudan (70% Muslim, 25% indigenous beliefs and 5% Christians) – like Iraq, Afghanistan, Syria and Islamic Iran, is the target of “Israel-First” Zionist Jews and Evangelists. Moreover, Sudan has 12% of world’s known oil resources.
Remember the so-called “Save Darfur” rally in Washington, D.C. on April 30 – eight western Christians, seven Jews, four politicians and assorted celebrities – but no Muslims and no one from Darfur addressed it!
Not long after the rally – Zionist propaganda-outlet “Sudan Sunrise” changed it website to eliminate its references to Evangelists’ efforts to convert Muslims in refugee camps in eastern Chad. Sunrise provided buses, speakers and food for 600 people, who attended the rally. Now, one may ask, why some American Jews and Evangelists are so concerned about the tragic events in an African Muslim country – and not in their so-called “Promised Land”, where their fellow Ethiopian Jews and native Christians are abused by the European Jew settlers – and one of three Jewish children live in poverty?
http://ww4report.com/node/2582
BAR Managing Editor Bruce Dixon wrote: “Among the latest false realities being pushed upon the American people are the simplistic pictures of Black vs. Arab genocide in Darfur, and the proposed solution: a robust US-backed or US-led military intervention in Western Sudan. Increasing scrutiny is being focused upon the “Save Darfur” lobby and the Save Darfur Coalition; upon its founders, its finances, its methods and motivations and its truthfulness. In the spirit of furthering that examination we here present ten reasons to suspect that the “Save Darfur” campaign is a PR scam to justify USrael intervention in Africa.
http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=453&Itemid=1
Recent Comments