Current Political Affairs

Saving humanity from ‘The Monster’

The great majority of top politicians in the US, UK, France, Germany and Australian know about ‘The Monster’, so powerful and so vicious, that they’re afraid to talk about it in the public. They know that it was ‘The Monster’ who was behind the assassination of Preident John F. Kennedy and his younger brother Robert Kennedy. They also know whstatedo were really behind the September 11, 2001 terrorism and the earlier attack on USS Liberty. Some of them also know why so much fuss is being generated for the construction of the Islamic Community Center in the vacinity of ‘Ground Zero’ – where bars, porn shops and other anti-social stuff already exist or who is behind the Islamophobia campaign. However, they feel safe by closing their eyes and pretending that ‘The elephant’ doesn’t exist – not in front of them at least.

In 1984, Admiral Thomas Moorer, former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, had stated: “I’ve never seen a President — I don’t care who he is — stand up to [the Jews] … They always get what they want. The Israelis know what is going on all the time. I got to the point where I wouldn’t write anything down. If the American people understood what a grip these people have got on our government, they would rise up in arms.”

For the last few decades, The Monster has been preparing the American public for a new battle field to die for Israel. Professor James Petras in his latest article, titled The State and local bases of Zionist power in America, stated that there are “at least 52 major Jewish organizations actively engaged in promoting Israel’s foreign policy, economic and technological agenda in the US”.

The grassroots membership ranges from several hundred thousand militants in the Jewish Federations of North America (JFNA) to one hundred thousand wealthy contributors, activists and power brokers in the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC). In addition scores of propaganda mills, dubbed think tanks, have been established by million dollar grants from billionaire Zionists including the Brookings Institute (Haim Saban) and the Hudson Institute among others. Scores of Zionist funded political action committees (PAC) have intervened in all national and regional elections, controlling nominations and influencing election outcomes. Publishing houses, including university presses have been literally taken over by Zionist zealots, the most egregious example being Yale University, which publishes the most unbalanced tracts parroting Zionist parodies of Jewish history.1 New heavily funded Zionist projects designed to capture young Jews and turn them into instruments of Israeli foreign policy includes “Taglit-Birthright” which has spent over $250 million dollars over the past decade sending over a quarter-million Jews (between 18-26) to Israel for 10 days of intense brainwashing.2 Jewish billionaires and the Israeli state foot the bill. The students are subject to a heavy dose of Israeli style militarism as they are accompanied by Israeli soldiers as part of their indoctrination; at no point do they visit the West Bank, Gaza or East Jerusalem. They are urged to become dual citizens and even encouraged to serve in the Israeli armed forces. In summary, the 52 member organizations of the Presidents of the Major American Jewish Organizations which we discuss are only the tip of the iceberg of the Zionist Power Configuration: taken together with the PACs, the propaganda mills, the commercial and University presses and mass media we have a matrix of power for understanding the tremendous influence they have on US foreign and domestic policy as it affects Israel and US Zionism.

While all their activity is dedicated first and foremost in ensuring that US Middle East policy serves Israel’s colonial expansion in Palestine and war aims in the Middle East, what B’nai B’rth euphemistically calls a “focus on Israel and its place in the world”, many groups ‘specialize’ in different spheres of activity. For example, the “Friends of the Israel Defense Force” is primarily concerned in their own words “to look after the IDF”, in other words provide financial resources and promote US volunteers for a foreign army (an illegal activity except when it involves Israel). Hillel is the student arm of the Zionist power configuration claiming a presence in 500 colleges and universities, all affiliates defending each and every human rights abuse of the Israeli state and organizing all expenses paid junkets for Jewish student recruits to travel to Israel where they are heavily propagandized and encouraged to ‘migrate’ or become ‘dual citizens’.

To understand US submission to Israeli war policies in the Middle East one has to look beyond the role of lobbies pressuring Congress and the role of political action committees and wealthy Zionist campaign contributions. A much neglected but absolutely essential building block of Zionist power over US foreign economic, diplomatic and military policy is the Zionist presence in key policy positions, including the Departments of Treasury and State, the Pentagon, the National Security Council and the White House.

Since 2004, the AIPAC appointee, Stuart Levey, Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence has applied his intelligence to the singular task of turning his office into the major foreign policy venue for setting US policy toward Iran. Levey more than any other appointed official in government or elected legislator, formulates and implements policies which profoundly influence US, European Union and UN economic relations with Iran. Levey elaborated the sanctions policies, which Washington imposed on the EU and the Security Council. Levey, organizes the entire staff under his control at Treasury to investigate trade and investment policies of all the world’s major manufacturing, banking, shipping, petroleum and trading corporations. He then criss-crosses the US and successfully pressures pension funds, investment houses, oil companies and economic institutions to disinvest from any companies dealing with Iran’s civilian economy. He has gone global, threatening sanctions and blackballing dissident companies in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and North America which refuse to surrender economic opportunities. They all understood Levey operated at the behest of Israel, services Levey has proudly performed.

Did the Israeli Defense Force Bomb Jews?

Bob Nichols is a Project Censored Award winner, a correspondent for the San Francisco Bay View newspaper. He reports on war, politics and the two nuclear laboratories in the Bay area. He is a former employee of an Army Ammunition Plant. His recent article with the above title was published in Veteran Today.

 Israel, a nuclear weapons armed colossus in the Middle East, fights a lot of wars with two small, almost defenseless neighboring countries – Lebanon and Gaza. The 2006 War with Lebanon took a turn for the worse, though.

Israel executed an emergency purchase for 100 plus US GBU-28 5,000 lb, or 2,722 kg, weaponized uranium aerosol bombs from their patron, the United States.

The GBU-28 is a cobbled together weapon consisting of an approximately 20 ft long surplus artillery barrel stuffed with uranium ballast and high explosives. It is very good for the delivery of a particular form of poison gas – a War Crime under several international treaties and US Law. But, who cares? the bomb’s victims? That hardly matters at all in the scheme of things.

The 100 plus GBU-28s were a very high priority purchase. Congress was duly notified and the very efficient government weapons sales office swung into action.

Before the short war was concluded the Israel/US tax payer paid extra to have the critical poison gas bombs air freighted in Airbus A310s and delivered to Israel before the end of the short war of choice. Now, that is a “gotta have it” poison gas bomb.

What is so special about a GBU-28 with about 4,000 lbs, or 1,818 kg, of uranium ballast, other than it’s manufacture, shipping, storage and use is a War Crime punishable by Death or Imprisonment?

The US Military long ago figured out the optimum explosive package to guarantee creation of highly effective radioactive, poisonous uranium aerosols from the GBU-28’s uranium ballast.

Sub-nanometer length ceramicized particles go right through clothing and skin, even a full MOPP suit offers no protection to the wearer. This puts all soldiers  and civilians in the area in the “Throw Away” column. Anyone in the Target Area will get Zapped, it is just a matter of time.

The combination of small size, electrical charge, radioactive emissions and Brownian Motion conspire to keep the invisible, odorless, tasteless metal particles mobilized in the lower atmosphere for a long time.

The short, intense bombing event occurred in the last days of the Lebanon Israeli  War. The bombing was concentrated just north of the shared Israeli Lebanese border. Both sides of the border are rural farming areas, both sides were subject to poison gas in the form of about 400,000 lbs, or 184,818 kg, of radioactive aerosols in two days.

The contaminated fruits and vegetables were ultimately sold and presumably consumed in the European Union, Israel and Lebanon, as well as other participating trading partner countries.

Shortly before the bombing, Israeli Jews were removed from the area.  After the bombing anti-Zionist Jews were moved in to work the radiologically contaminated Israeli farms by the Israeli Defense Forces. As one person commented, “Y’know, the Orthodox guys with long sideburns that nobody likes.”

Weaponized uranium ions attack a Human population’s reproductive capacity at the cellular level, their brains and bones.

The IDF bombed Southern Lebanon at the Israel/Lebanon border. Then they moved in famously anti-Zionist Jews to the newly radioactive and invisibly contaminated part of Northern Israel.

This is a characteristic absolute, no holds barred condemnation of the Zionists by Hasidic Jews published on August 22, 2010:

Did the IDF know that poison gas spreads? The inability to predict or control poison gas is pretty standard stuff – it is well known since its use in WWI. As a result of this and other FUBAR moves, the Sperm count of 18 year old males plummeted 40% in less than 10 years. Just because a person can’t see radiation doesn’t mean it is not dangerous. Now the whole nation must pay a terrible price.

An interview with Manouchehr Mottaki

In an exclusive interview with IslamOnline.net, Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki touched upon topics ranging from Iran’s nuclear program, to the presence of foreign forces in war-hacked Afghanistan to support for Palestinians resistance.

He gave a passionate defense of his country’s much-criticized nuclear program.

“They (US and West) have been raising this issue unduly. They know we are not going to develop nuclear bomb,” said Mottaki.

“It is nothing but a propaganda that Iran is going to make nuclear bomb and is a threat to regional security.

“We don’t believe in nuclear bomb.”

The West accuses Tehran of developing a secret nuclear weapons program.

Iran insists that its nuclear program only aims at procuring power to feed an increasing local consumption.

“We are like other countries which have energy needs. And we have the fundamental right to cope with our energy needs in line with other countries,” said Mottaki.

He asserts that nuclear weapons do not win wars nowadays.

“Nuclear bomb doesn’t matter nowadays. If it matters, then the US could have won the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, Israel could have won the wars in Lebanon and against Hamas, and the USSR could have avoided disintegration.”

Assuring Gulf

The top diplomat tried to assure the Arab world, especially Gulf neighbors, that Iran is not a threat to their security.

“This is merely propaganda. Our nuclear program is not at all a threat to any country, especially those which are located along the Persian Gulf,” Mottaki said, using the Iranian name for the Arab Gulf.

“Some Persian Gulf countries have been raising concerns about Iran’s nuclear program saying that they are merely 120 kilometers away from our main nuclear center,” he added.

“And I respond to them, that we are only two kilometers away from that (nuclear site).

“There is no need to be scared of it.”

Mottaki offered the Gulf countries to send their own experts to visit his country’s nuclear sites.

“We ask them to dispatch their experts to see what our nuclear program is? We have already made it clear to them that Iran’s nuclear program is not aimed at making a nuclear bomb.”

Afghanistan

Mottaki reiterated Iran’s opposition to the presence of foreign forces in neighboring war-torn Afghanistan.

“When innocent people are being bombed in Afghanistan and a leader like Benazir Bhutto is killed in Pakistan, then we are compelled to say that the region is much more insecure and tense after eight years of foreign forces presence in the region,” he told IOL.

“Our realistic judgment is that foreign forces have failed in Afghanistan.”

He cited the aggravating problem of opium cultivation as an example.

“Before the arrival of foreign troops the annual production of drugs was merely a few hundred tons, and after eight years it is over 8000 tons per year.”

Mottaki said his country supported the ouster of foreign forces from Afghanistan and the region.

“Iran has been calling for last eight years that there is no military solution of the Afghanistan problem. The ongoing policies have miserably failed to resolve this problem.”

He believes the solution for Afghanistan is a regional cooperation between Pakistan, Iran and Afghanistan.

The three countries held a conference in Islamabad last month to formulate a joint strategy to deal with the crisis following the proposed withdrawal of foreign troops.

“We are of the opinion that foreign forces are suffering from a political vacuum in Afghanistan. This vacuum may be widened in 2011. Therefore, we think that the regional countries can fill this vacuumed,” said Mottaki.

“The best strategy to resolve Afghanistan problem, is the regional strategy.”

Cancer Israel

The Iranian foreign minister urged those Muslim states which have recognized Israel to sever ties with Tel Aviv.

“It has usurped the homes and hearths of Palestinians. It has a 60-year-old history of occupation, crimes, and aggression,” he said.

“Therefore, those Islamic countries should sever ties with this illegal state.”

On April 18, 1948, Palestinian Tiberius was captured by Menachem Begin’s Irgun militant group, putting its 5,500 Palestinian residents in flight. On April 22, Haifa fell to the Zionist militants and 70,000 Palestinians fled.

On April 25, Irgun began bombarding civilian sectors of the Palestinian city of Jaffa — the largest city in Palestine at that time, terrifying the 750,000 inhabitants into panicky flight.

On May 14, the day before the creation of Israel, Jaffa completely surrendered to the much better-equipped Zionist militants and only about 4,500 of its population remained.

Israel was created on the rubble of Palestine on May 15, 1948.

“Israel, for us, is like cancer in the body,” Mottaki insisted.

“It’s not Iran, but it’s Israel which poses a permanent threat to the entire region.”

   

Israel plans to invade Lebanon this autum

French President Nicholas Sarkozy is son of a Jewish mother-Christian father French couple. In November 2007, French daily Le Figaro revealed that Sarkozy had been an agent of Israeli Mossad.

Sayanim is a Hebrew word which means ‘volunteers’ – and according to Jeff Gates there are tens of thousand of them in United States (could be as many as one million around the world).

Currently, Sarkozy’s government is preparing groundwork for the Zionist regime to settle its scores with Lebanese Islamic Resistance, Hizbullah, for its 2006 military humiliation – before it bomb Islamic Iran.

The recent French military provocation when on Israeli request the soldiers belonging to French contingent with the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) raided the houses of the suspected Hizbullah members. The search orders came from French Defense Minister Hervé Morin. When the Lebanese complaint was discussed in the UNSC, France presented excuses through Claude Guéant, general secretary of the French President Sarkozy.

According to an article published by Voltairenet.org, the Zionist entity is planning to invade Lebanon this autum.

On 10 July, the French army conducted a significant evacuation exercise involving French nationals.

The Special Tribunal For Lebanon, which was created by the Security Council (officially in connection with the assassination of former Lebanese Prime Minister Rafiq Hariri) to serve as a political tool against Syria, abandoned indictment procedures against Syrian President Bachar el-Assad and former Lebanese President Emile Lahoud, since as time went by the charges against them were proven false. Notwithstanding, it is not to be excluded that the Tribunal could still order an arraignment in September or October. At that point, according to Hezbollah Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah, the Special Tribunal would be turned into a political instrument against the Resistance. It may indulge in false accusations, even more fanciful than the previous ones, but this time against the Hezbollah. This maneuver would aim to create internal dissidence and open the door for a new military attack by Israel.

In Washington, the Saban Center (Brookings Institution) and the Council on Foreign Relations have published two contradictory reports. According to the first one, Israel should be given complete leeway. The second report recommends, instead, that the Obama Administration should exert pressure on Netanyahu before, during and after the conflict with a view to containing it. These documents should be deciphered in light of the leadership rivalry that has subsisted between Tel Aviv and Washington for some time. The fact remains that both of these reports are based on the foregone conclusion that Israel is determined to get back at Lebanon and that no one will be able to stop it.

Maura Connelly appeared before the Senate on 20 July to be confirmed as next Ambassador to Lebanon. She backed the policy laid down by Obama’s Middle East peace broker George Mitchell: the United States should no longer pursue a direct confrontation strategy with the Hezbollah, which enjoys majority support among the population, but should seek to isolate it instead. In other words, Washington should pretend to interpret an Israeli war against Lebanon as a police operation against the Hezbollah and refrain from intervening openly.

On his part, de facto President of the Palestinian Authority Mahmoud Abbas sent a message to the Palestinian refugees in Lebanon asking them not to leave their camps during the offensive slated for this autumn. These instructions correspond to the points of consensus prevailing in Washington. Any attempt to use the Palestinians (mainly sunni) against the Hezbollah (mainly shiite) would be counterproductive for the interests of the United States in Lebanon and could spawn negative effects throughout the region.

Saving Zionist entity from doom

Gone are the days when Zionist Golda Mier assured his fellow Zionist thugs that “there is no such thing as Palestinian people”. Then they told the world that Palestinians already have a country, Jordan. On April 29, 2010 – Israeli daily Ha’aretz quoted Knesset Speaker Reuven Rivlin saying: “I would rather accept Palestinians as Israeli citizen than divide Israel and the West Bank in a future two-state solution. A month later, former Israeli  Defense Minister and a radical Zionist Jew, Moshe Aren endorsed Reuven Rivlin’s idea of a ‘one state’ for both the native Arabs and the foreign Jew settlers. However, he did mention his fear that absorbing another one million Palestinian Muslims and Christians living in the West Bank would pose a demographic problem which would end Zionists’ dream of a ‘Jewish State’.

Glad Atzmon in his July 20 post, titled “On the Israeli Right’s New Peace Agenda” wrote:

As the Israelis are becoming conscious of their inevitable tragic circumstances, a final desperate attempt to rescue the Zionist project has come to life. Astonishingly enough it is the Israeli right that is now pushing for ‘one binational State.’ It is pretty staggering to find out that while the Israeli so-called ‘left’ is locked within the 1967 territorial paradigm that is fueled by Judeo centric racial ideology, it is actually the hawkish Zionist thinkers who are willing to move the discourse forward.

This Zionist political novelty doesn’t take me by complete surprise. Unlike the Jewish left that is tribally orientated both in Israel and in the West, the right wing Zionist philosophy was grounded on a dream of an eternal bond between the Jew and the alleged ‘promised land’. In Zion the Jew was supposed to transcend oneself beyond the race and the tribe. Israel was there to demolish the ghetto wall. As it happened, in practice, Israel had become the biggest ghetto in Jewish history.

However, there is a clear trap here. As much as the peace loving Zionist hawks seem to  champion Palestinian civil rights, the vision of a ‘one binational state’ is still totally Judeo centric.  The Israeli advocates of the one binational state are not talking about a neutral “state of all its citizens”, nor about “Israstine” with a flag showing a crescent and a Shield of David.   One state still means a sovereign Jewish state, but in a more complex reality, and inspired by the vision of a “democratic Jewish state” without an occupation and without apartheid, without fences and separations.

I guess that this what it is all about. The Israeli hawks want to counter the inevitable ‘demographic disaster’. They would offer West Bank Palestinians Israeli ID cards, and  offer them to “enjoy ice cream in Tel Aviv” as long as they are kept as a minority. The Israeli hawks ignore Gaza  and the right of return. In practice they dismiss the Palestinian cause for they are certain that the Jewish one is superior. In short, this is not a solution or a resolution. It is just another Zionist spin  that is planted in our discourse in order to disseminate confusion.